I always chuckle when I hear people refer to California as the 'land of fruits and nuts' and loudly proclaim that it's a 'liberal state'. I concede, the state is blue – at least when one examines it at surface level – but when you drill down a little further, it's not quite that simple.
Example? As far as privacy is concerned, you'd have better luck in Ohio (State v. Smith)…
Based on two events that took place this week, it's clear that California (or more accurately, the Governor of California) and the Federal government appear to be in lockstep re their attitude toward location privacy; they don't believe you're entitled to it.
Politics? Of course, that always plays a role. Lack of understanding of technology? Let me put it this way; a lot of the arguments I see in support of the position against requiring a warrant go something like this:
"People are aware that their cellular devices disclose their location and, therefore, have no expectation of privacy." Yes – in the same way that people who drive cars know how to rebuild the engines. It's a self-serving argument, at best. For the average Joe, a more honest side-by-side comparison is that people know how to plug in a charger about as well as they know how to insert a gas nozzle.
If you're worried about location privacy, I have two words for you – coarse location.