My Pick for Super Bowl XLV is…

MP900182724 …hey, this isn't a sports blog, it's an e-discovery blog!  What were you thinking?!?!  Since it's a bit late on the-Friday-before-the-big-day, I know what's being discussed at the water cooler: 1) I can't wait for Super Bowl!, 2) I need to go to the store to get seven-layer bean dip for Super Bowl!, 3) I hate Super Bowl!  Are you getting the common thread, here?  Well fine, I'm going to enjoy Super Bowl, too, but I'm closing my week with a summary of day one of LTNY.  I'll cover day two Monday – and you'll definitely want to check it out since one of the features will be on predictive coding.

On the red-eye, I happened to be sitting next to the only guy on the entire plane who wanted to be awake all night.  So, combining the fact that I'd been awake all-day Sunday as well, by the time I returned to my room Monday night I'd been awake 35 hours!  Coffee notwithstanding, this didn't assist my concentration.  However, I did manage to make it in time for the opening keynote on a subject which is basically the mission statement of this blog; "Legal vs. IT: Turn the Battle into a Solution to Meet Compliance".

Are we in agreement that this theme has been discussed to death?  Ok.  We get it.  IT, Legal – and all the other players – must find a way to cooperate.  This guy at e-Discovery Insights keeps telling us that all the time!  But this was a speech by the Deputy General Counsel of HP – inducing cooperation on a scale of this magnitude is no easy feat, so believe me, I was interested in what he had to say.

I've had a multinational focus of late, so to start out, I attended a session on deploying a global records management program.  KPMG was the example company, with 390,000 employees in 170 countries.  Records management is tough enough when following a dearth of state and federal laws domestically.  Now extrapolate for the world.  Check back with me when you're done.

In the afternoon, I attended a session called "Anatomy of the Case", which took us through an 'event' from start to finish.  Aside from always being an interesting journey, I wanted to go because an attorney from Orrick was on the panel.  Orrick is a unique firm with a heavy emphasis on technology, so I was interested in their story.

There was a final afternoon session, but by then my brain had pretty much given up on me – and I had meetings to attend later that evening, so I decided to give myself a break.

My take on the first day?  To be honest, I was a bit disappointed because I didn't feel that I'd learned anything new.  This doesn't mean the sessions were bad; to the contrary, they were excellent.  They just covered material I was already familiar with, so perhaps I didn't choose well.  Interestingly, one of the experts I spoke with on day two reacted to my comments by saying I should feel really good then, because it must mean that I know a lot.  Certainly I'd like to think that after so many years of doing this, I do know a lot, but one thing has always been clear; there's a lot more to learn.

Luckily, I found that out on day two!

P.S.  I suppose since I lured you here under false pretenses, I'm obligated to provide my Super Bowl pick.  Let me preface this by saying that I have a running bet with the son of some very close friends.  Ciaran is a great kid, however, he's notorious for picking the loser in every Super Bowl as far back as I can remember.  Therefore, with personal loyalties completely in check, my procedure is to find out his pick, then bet against them (this has worked flawlessly for years!).  I call it my "Ciaran Contrarian Super Bowl Calculator".

This year, he chose the Steelers.  Excellent choice, of course, but he'll be wrong.  Therefore, I'm obligated to pick the Packers.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on RedditEmail this to someonePrint this page