Category Archives: Miscellaneous

Facebook, et al: “Evidentiary Gold Mines”

J0401177 I haven't re-visited social networking lately, but this article on Time.com is a favorite.  Their exact quote is, "Lawyers, however, love these sites, which can be evidentiary gold mines."  Then, of course, it goes on to list some of the nightmare scenarios in which Facebook posts became evidence, among other things (divorce being a very common reason, but by no means the only one).

Tip:  If a lawyer loves something, you'd better take note (unless it's you they love; in that case, demand a pre-nup…).

Let's put it this way.  Yes, Twitter may change the way we live, but not necessarily the way you expect.

**FLASH** – Late word comes in to the blog-room that Governor Schwarzenegger was seen frantically digging on Facebook looking for nuggets to address the California budget shortfall…we're going to be completely out of cash in less than 50 days

Guess I'm in a snarky mood today…did I mention I'm not a morning person?  Have a great weekend everyone.

2009 ABA Legal Technology 2: The Count

TheCount Fast on the heels of my prior post about the ABA Legal Technology Survey, comes more excerpts that I think are of interest…

Attorneys;  you really need to take note of these statistics.  This is where technology is taking us, and you have a clear choice.  You can either jump on the bandwagon…or end up chasing it!

One interesting item I noted was that, in many cases, survey results for 2009 were either at par with 2008 or even slightly lower.  Based on my experience – and my observations of exponential growth in many of these areas – my theory is that this is purely due to the economic downturn.  Margin-of-error would explain some of it, but no other factors I can think of would produce this result.

PDAs REVISITED

60% of survey respondents say they use PDAs (BlackBerry's, etc.) in the courtroom – hopefully not while the court's in session (I've seen that icy glare from the judge more than once!).  Only 39% reported doing so in the 2007 survey.  That's quite a jump in a short period of time.

e-DISCOVERY REQUESTS vs. DEMANDS

54% report that they receive e-discovery requests (on behalf of their clients, of course).  46% indicate that they make e-discovery requests.  An interesting bi-bifurcation, here.  Receipt of e-discovery requests is growing relatively steadily, whereas making e-discovery requests was at 74% in 2007, 50% in 2008 and 46% in 2009 – a sharp drop-off.

ATTORNEY BLAWGING

A sparse 11% of respondents report that their firms have polices re attorney blawgs.  When large firms are broken out separately, 25% have policies.  This shouldn't be too surprising to anyone since large firms are more likely to be aware of their potential liability and are also more likely to have someone on staff who is technically savvy.

SOCIAL NETWORKING – FIRMS

The survey specifically cites sites (I just had to put those two words side-by-side) like Facebook, LinkedIn, LawLink and Legal OnRamp.  I would differentiate between business-related networks (e.g. LinkedIn) and personal ones that are used for business (i.e. Facebook) because I think it's a major distinction – but the survey apparently doesn't.

Overall, 12% said they maintain a presence in this area, but one thing is clear – generally speaking, the larger the firm, the less likely that it maintains a presence.

SOCIAL NETWORKING – PERSONAL

Oh boy.  If you've been following this blog, you know my attitude about attorneys and social networks. This statistic is of more interest to me.  43% reported that they maintain a personal presence in one of these communities.

Are you listening, employers?

e-Discovery California: Brother, Can you Spare a Dime?

J0438680 I admit…it was really hard not to title this post with a quip from the Terminator, but it's like shooting fish in a barrel, don't you think?

As expected, all five propositions that would have critically affected the California budget, failed.  So, we enter the next fiscal year, beginning July 1st, in big trouble.

At this point, I'm hoping the result doesn't affect AB 5 (it seems we have bipartisan buy-in on it), but I can also wish for pie in the sky; a veto-proof vote.

P.S.  I'm sure some of you are wondering, and the answer is, yes, I voted in the election – by absentee ballot.  I take my civic duty very seriously.  And no, I'm not going to tell you how I voted.

It's no small feat.  Californians have been asked to go to the polls twelve times in the past seven years!

Perhaps this is why less than 20% of eligible voters exercised their right to do so…

e-Discovery California: AB 5 & May 19th – Collision Course?

J0387087 California has serious budget problems.  May 19th, five propositions, 1A through 1E, are on the ballot of a special election that will directly affect the future of the state (there's a sixth, 1F, but it isn't important for our purposes right now).

If they fail – and all indications are that they will – the state budget shortfall will reach $21.3 billion.  The legislature's Chief Budget Analyst says the state could be broke by July.

See why I'm worried?  This is exactly the same scenario that allowed Governor Schwarzenegger to veto AB 5 (in its previous rendition) the last time!

Will we see a repeat?  Governor, my advice;  please don't play politics with a much-needed set of regulations.

e-Discovery 101: I’m Easy, but I’m not Cheap!

J0438746 …ok, I'm probably not too easy, either…

Law.com posted this article about cost-effective e-discovery in this time of economic turmoil.  Do I think I've covered most of it on this blog before?  Yes, but it's a good summary.  It also supports what I feel is the real necessity in this – and frankly, most other processes – brain power.

You can take the best software products, hardware, vendors – and anything else you want to toss into the mix, but if the people coordinating and managing them aren't up to the requirements, the entire thing will break down.  This is why I'm not impressed when I go to tech shows and the people selling the products are lawyers.  They may be lawyers, but when I ask them a few questions, it's clear most of them don't know a thing about e-discovery.

You can put the worst driver in the world behind the wheel of a Yugo or a Rolls Royce – neither will enable them to drive in the Indy 500…or on the 405 freeway…